Your board. Your calls.
Track prospects, build your rankings, and keep your scouting notes together.
Loading prospect data…
Top 100 prospects by consensus ranking. Borderline prospects are the next 25 pushing for a top-100 spot.
| Watch / compare | Consensus rank | Player / team | Position | Sources / range | Movement ⓘ | My rank | Scouting | Notes |
|---|
Source freshness & methodology
Four publishers, equal weight. One is Sports Gaming Rosters’ preliminary NBA 2K draft-class board; it provides deeper coverage but is less established as an NBA scouting source. Each ranking is capped at 126; an unlisted player also receives 126. The mean of those values determines consensus order (lower is better). Ties favor more source coverage, then lower raw average rank, then name. This is a top-125 scoring rule, not a claim that an unlisted player is ranked 126 by a publisher.
Sources publish boards of different depths and ages. Coverage counts actual appearances; the range shows actual ranks, including those beyond 125. A fetched timestamp records retrieval, not the publisher’s editorial update. Failed feeds retain their last successful snapshot and are labeled stale. Syndicated articles count once for their original publisher. Article feeds track that article’s URL; they do not automatically discover a new edition.
Recent: under 14 days; aging: 14–29 days; older: 30+ days. Unknown dates are not treated as fresh. Date flags do not change publisher weights. Disagreement uses the full best-to-worst published rank range; 40+ places is wide only with at least three sources. Missing ranks do not count toward that range.
The 2027 order isn't set until the May 2027 lottery, so you choose each pick's team: set slots one by one or shuffle a random order. Traded and forfeited picks aren't modeled unless you edit the slots. Simulated picks follow the chosen board and aren't predictions.